Australopithecus Vs. Paranthropus

Scientists have had much difficulty interpreting the phylogenetic relationships of the down(p) Skull because it is comprised of both primitive features and derived ones. It has a very small brainiac volume, a macro-scale sagittal crest, and the upper face projects consid whilebly. every(prenominal) of these traits place it in the early Australopithecus af atomic number 18nsis grouping. However, the Black Skull in any case features derived traits associated with later robust hominids. This includes such traits as a hulky face, a large palate, and a large bea for the digest dentition. Thus, a clear understanding of where this skull belongs becomes troublesome and a upstart(a) species, Paranthropus aethiopicus, has been created for the skull.         Australopithecines can be specify as hominids from the Plio-Pleistocene sequence in Africa characterized by bipedal locomotion and a relatively small brain. Paranthropucines are similar to Australopit hecines except they are outlined as more robust, that is they have much larger teething and larger jaws meant to process tough foods.

The Mystery Specimen from commit 5 resembles both Australopithecus afarensis and Paranthropus boisei, but because it has a sagittal crest, it must be a Paranthropus. Its primitive features are slight prognathism and a relatively small neurocranium. Its derived features include large molars, a wide flat face, and a sagittal crest. If you pauperization to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our p! age: cheap essay